Vol. 2: April 1998
04-29-1998: Computer Room Temperature
Hello once again, faithful readers!
I was appalled today to hear
a friend (obviously not very computer literate, and whom shall remain nameless)
say that A/C in an office with computers is optional, not required. Perhaps in
Alaska! <G>
Many new computers have an LM78 or similar IC (sometimes
two) to monitor various parameters inside the PC, such as voltages, fan speeds,
CPU temperature, and motherboard temperature. There are good reasons the last
three are monitored! In the event that a fan were to fail, or one of the
temperatures exceed specifications (which are as low as 60 C for CPU and 50 C
for the MB) the CPU speed is instantly cut back to 1/8 to 1/2 normal CPU clock
speed. Why? To save the CPU from self-destruction due to the overheat, which may
be caused by inadequate/failed heatsink/fan on the CPU, poor case ventilation,
excessive room temperature, or resulting from overclocking modifications. So,
obviously if the system runs at temperatures over these, performance will take a
big hit. Reliability also suffers a lot with room temperatures in excess of 85
degrees F. I've seen several computers fail from the heat of a 90 degree F room.
Today's CPU's dissipate as much as 35 watts, in approximately one square
inch (more area on PPros and PII's) which mandates a good heatsink. As I
mentioned previously, it is not impossible to keep a CPU running at under 80 F
with one, good case ventilation, and air temp in the high 60's. But, the CPU is
not the only item to get hot. Your RAM, cache, chipset, video card, sound card,
hard drive, and monitor are also devices which require cooling, and are proven
to be less reliable in an un-airconditioned environment. A/C also removes
humidity from the air and filters dust from it. So, why be without it? Huge
corporations can't have been wrong for decades, keeping their computers in very
cool rooms. There is a reason folks! The inside of the computer case is also
often 10 F warmer than ambient air due to all of the heat sources inside.
If a CPU is cool enough, it can be run much harder. So, if I run mine in an
ambient temperature of 68 F (I don't keep my A/C below 77, but my downstairs can
get this cool easily) and somebody else runs theirs in an ambient of 90 F, I
will be able to get more speed AND stability out of mine, if all other factors
are he same. I use an extra large heatsink on the CPU, and also install an
auxiliary fan in the case, for better cooling and in case the power supply fan
fails. My Aunt's computer burned up when her fan failed in a 90 F room while the
system was operating. The HD was too noisy to hear the fan stop, but the HD and
CPU rapidly let her know that all data was lost. :-) DEC used the following
theory on a personal supercomputer of 767 MHz. By keeping the CPU cooled to a
sub-freezing level with a refrigeration system contained in the case, they were
able to significantly increase the clock speed.
So, it is a matter of personal choice, but my computers will always be
treated to cool air, and I will enjoy the increased speed and service life, plus
the greater stability. If you want to take chances with several thousand dollars
of equipment, perhaps you enjoy the thrill of risks like that. I don't though.
:-)
04-26-1998
Browsers & Web Caching Software
Hello once again, faithful readers!
It has come to my attention that
the function and usefulness of Web caching software is not well known. The cache
(both memory and disk) in a Web browser, such as Netscape Navigator, is not long
lived, is not as fast as other products, and does not have advanced functions
such as pre-fetching and prediction. It also is limited to 64MB,** but this limit will almost never be reached as the
cache data is not held on disk very long (ever see the "Cache Cleanup,
removing 1200 files" dialog?). Some of you access the Web at work (or at
home for us technogeeks<G>) via a caching proxy server. This cache is
usually much larger, and longer lived, than Netscape's. It also has the
advantages of scale, in that if twenty folks are using it, the amount of sites
already in the cache will potentially be much larger than the sites stored in
one person's Netscape cache. The Wizard's Tower uses a caching proxy server at
192.168.53.215, port 8000, which is fed by all of my Internet dialup users and
any local users (friends and myself). This proxy server is also pre-loaded by
another caching proxy server, but this one is different. I run Gotit! on another machine, which is an intelligent, pre-fetching, predicting
cache. Every night, Gotit refreshes it's cache, which in effect pulls the data
into our main Proxy server, keeping some of it's data refreshed at least daily.
Gotit is a great program, which will speed up almost anyone's Internet access
considerably.
What can you do, besides obtaining Gotit, to speed your WWW experience?
Under the Edit menu of Netscape, there is a Preferences tab. Click on this, then
go into the Advanced folder in there. Click on Cache.*
Set the Memory Cache to 1024 on a 16-meg RAM machine, 2048 for a 32 meg RAM
machine, and 4096 for a 64+ meg RAM machine. Set the Disk cache to 9216 Kb on
machines with little hard drive space, (20 MB free etc.) and if you have in
excess of 100 megabytes free, set it to 65535 Kb.**
(it will almost never actually use that much). Again, the cache in Netscape is
not very good (although apparently better than Internet Explorer's) and with
Gotit in use, I recommend Netscape's memory cache setting to be 512 Kb, and the
disk cache to 4096 Kb, as Gotit will be doing the bulk of the caching. Try to
give Gotit at least 64 MB of a cache on your HD. If you have 200 MB free, set it
to 128 MB or more. It won't fill up overnight, but Gotit will eventually fill it
up. Gotit also takes a couple of weeks to learn your surfing habits for best
speed, so if you install it, give it some time before you decide to buy it or
not. You can't just install it, not surf for two weeks, and expect it to know
what to prefetch for you. <G> There is almost no disadvantage to using
Gotit, if it isn't refreshing the pages you want often enough, simply press your
browser's Refresh button, and you'll always have the latest copy. The time saved
by Gotit is considerable, and I'm sure you will find it a good value, as I have.
The downside is that it is only compatible with Windows '95 or NT, and will
almost certainly not work with my WCNavigator winsock dialup software. I'd need
to get a program called WCPPP before I can offer 100% true dialup connections to
everyone. I'll post more on these topics as users request.
Enjoy!!
-Vince
|
04-19-1998
Wizard's Tower Update
Hello once again, faithful readers!
I am beginning to cut down the
number of messages stored on the system from about 300,000 to something more
reasonable, which will speed up searches and off-line mail runs. Most folks
don't need echomail from years ago. If anyone has any special needs for an echo
to keep more than 200-500 messages in it at all times, let me know and I'll
gladly give it a 1000 or 2000 message limit.
There is a Computer Show
coming up on the 25th, this Saturday. I need to go to purchase items for
friends, and am looking for folks to come along. As always, I take care of all
transportation to and from the show to my place in TR.
Let me know if you are
interested ASAP. The show is in Cherry Hill and is the area's second largest.
We had a hardware crash last night (NT bluescreen) that was not
auto-restartable. These are extremely rare as NT has proven itself to be a
robust O/S. However, since we installed the last 64 MB DIMM I assume that the
SDRAM timings had to be slowed slightly, so I incremented one of them, we will
have to see if it happens again. These kinds of crashes can be brought on by
memory inadequacies and are usually fixable by entering more wait states in the
BIOS. Of course, our running at a 75 MHz bus speed doesn't help. <G> But
even so, the crashes have been less than once a month, and this is only the
second one. I apologize for the downtime.
I am working on cleaning up this
page and editing the older rants to reflect later information. Please bear with
my lack of timely updates due to a lack of time.
04-05-1998
Today's News
I'm glad to announce that we now have a 56K x2 connection to the Internet!
The average connect speed is a mere 48000 BPS but this is almost double our
prior rate, so expect a faster surfing experience to or from this site.
If
anyone ever wants to be quoted in this column, or turn this disorganized mess <G>
into something nicer, let me know. I'm open for suggestions and want to get this
page graphical soon (or at least away from hospital-like Hi-Gloss Ultra Pure
White <G>).